Step 1 · Listen
What the track needs, honestly.
Four services, with the splits and registrations done properly.
We settle who owns what before the session rather than after the track does well, because that is when agreement becomes difficult. A producer who contributed to the composition has a claim on the song, not just the recording, and leaving that vague is how co-writers end up in disputes years later over something nobody wrote down in an afternoon.
What the track needs, honestly.
Who owns what, in writing.
Produced, mixed and mastered.
Masters and credits handed over.
What exists, and who wrote it.
Term, territory and income split.
Take independent legal advice.
Copy given to the writer.
An assignment of copyright is only effective in writing and signed, so there is no such thing as a publishing deal agreed by conversation. We write down what is assigned, for how long and for which territories, and we tell artists to take independent legal advice before signing. If that advice talks them out of it, the deal was not good enough.
This is the unglamorous work that decides whether money arrives. Performing and mechanical income on the song is collected through PRS for Music and MCPS; income from use of the recording comes through PPL. Separate registrations, separate memberships. Add wrong metadata on a release and the royalty exists but cannot find its owner.
What is registered, and where.
Which society is missing.
Work and recording, separately.
Checked before the release date.
Said straight, not flattered.
What a release needs to work.
Released with correct metadata.
Catalogue, not a single moment.
We do not charge an artist a fee to find them work or to be considered, which the law restricts and which we would not do anyway: a company paid upfront has no incentive to be truthful about someone's prospects. We also say when a track is not ready, and when an artist would be better served by another label.
Send it over. The first conversation is free, and we will tell you what we honestly think.